Home / Crops / Wheat / Wheat Production / With wheat, better safe than sorry

With wheat, better safe than sorry

Agriculture.com Staff 01/11/2011 @ 12:59pm

By Ed Haag


In the summer of 2002, Kim Kidwell, Washington State University (WSU) wheat breeder, was feeling confident about Zak, the newly released variety from her spring wheat breeding program. She believed it offered Washington grain growers a level of stripe rust resistance that could withstand even the most adverse set of circumstances.

That was before her telephone rang. “A farmer reached me on a Sunday, and I went out to check the field that same day,” she recalls. “When I saw it, I knew we were in trouble.”

A quick visual assessment indicated the stripe rust infection level on the new release had exceeded its economic viability threshold. It required immediate spraying with a fungicide in order to avert further crop damage.

Kidwell and others viewing the rust damage harbored no illusions that the infection was a localized event. They knew from past experience that with a rust outbreak of this magnitude, it was highly likely that the problem extended well beyond that particular farm. An Extension crop emergency was declared and through a telephone tree, the other growers of Zak were immediately contacted.

“At the time, there were about 150,000 acres of Zak in production,” says Kidwell. “Most had to be sprayed.”

The stripe rust damage wasn’t just confined to Zak. Other wheat germplasm sources had new releases that were also seriously impacted by the rust that year. The newly released soft white spring wheats were particularly hard hit.

“In 2002, the best new releases from every program in the region were overcome by stripe rust,” says Kidwell. “It was an event that literally rocked the foundations of the Pacific Northwest grain farming community, and no one saw it coming.”

Besides the $15- to $20-per-acre spraying cost, many growers who had planted spring wheat crops faced serious yield reductions attributed directly to a stripe rust infection. “The costs ran into the millions of dollars,” says Kidwell. “We had to figure out a way to prevent such an event from happening in the future.”

Resistance Is Relative

CancelPost Comment
MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Contract-spreading sends old-crop corn, soybeans down, new-crop higher
MORE FROM AGRICULTURE.COM STAFF more +

Topsoil runoff losses can cost you By: 05/14/2013 @ 11:04am As rainfall increases, the amount of topsoil decreases. So does the amount of grain the land can ...

Organic group invites farmer input By: 05/10/2013 @ 2:23pm The Organic Trade Association (OTA) recently announced formation of a new Farmers Advisory Council ...

Best practices for boosting barley yields By: 05/09/2013 @ 3:38pm Boosting barley and other crop yields depends to a large degree on controlling "the ...