Guidance systems: Show me the benefits
"My guidance system paid off in one year simply by relieving stress." That comment by a farmer at the National No-till Conference in St. Louis, Missouri, last month got many nods of agreement from others in the room.
Placing a dollar value on stress may be difficult. But if you ever drove a spray rig through a field of drilled soybeans at 10 mph while keeping an eye on blobs of white foam 30 feet to your right or left, investing a few thousand in a device that lets you relax a bit more in the tractor cab may seem like a good deal.
We'll discuss specific economic benefits below. But first let's cover the costs. A Global Positioning System (GPS) based guidance system with an accuracy of about 20 inches costs around $3000 to $10,000. These typically use "light bars" or more expensive graphic displays, to help the operator steer in the desired path. This accuracy is fine for broadcasting fertilizer or spraying chemicals.
An auto-steer system, accurate to within one inch, costs about $50,000. These systems include $25,000 for a tower with a 5 mile line-of-sight signal. That cost might be shared among neighbors using the same system. The driver gets the vehicle in approximately the right position at the end of the field, then the system takes over steering the tractor in a straight line. At the far end a signal, kind of like rumble strips before a sharp curve, alerts the driver to be ready to turn 180 degrees. Although this system does not replace an operator, 90 percent of the time he or she can let go of the steering wheel and concentrate on watching the equipment and gauges, or relax, talk on the phone, even work on a laptop computer.
John Deere recently introduced a $15,000 system for its rubber tracked tractors, accurate to 4 inches, definitely precise enough for planting. A $50,000 system may seem expensive. But consider this scenario: for a 2000 acre farm, a 5 year useful life means a simple cost of $5/acre/year.
Many potential benefits apply for all guidance systems. For this discussion, I'll use an auto-steer system for the examples.
Faster operating speed, perhaps a 0.5 mph increase on average
Less fatigue, perhaps adding 2 to 4 hours per day with the same level of exhaustion and safety. (Or quit at the same time as usual, feeling relaxed and rested)
The combination of these two (faster operation and longer days) could allow a farmer to add at least 10 percent more acres, farming 2200 acres instead of 2000.
Nighttime operation is more feasible, perhaps as accurate as daytime. Spraying at night when there is less wind minimizes drift. Planting corn around the clock is an option to reduce timeliness costs and/or manage with smaller equipment.
Dust or fog (or driving toward a setting sun) does not affect accuracy as it does with human eyesight.
Savings on inputs. To guard against skips, many operators often aim for about a 5% overlap. Precise driving can mean a 5% savings on chemicals, broadcast fertilizer and lime, broadcast seeds (no row markers), fuel, labor, and machinery depreciation.