Home / News / Crops news / What Vernon Bowman Says About Today’s Supreme Court Oral Arguments

What Vernon Bowman Says About Today’s Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Gil Gullickson 02/19/2013 @ 10:57am Crops Technology Editor for Successful Farming magazine/Agriculture.com

Vernon Bowman is combination frustrated and bemused about his case that’s being argued today before the U.S. Supreme Court.

“Neither side seems to get the point,” says the 75-year-old farmer from Sandborn, Indiana. Monsanto is suing Bowman for patent infringement for planting commodity soybean seed. Lower courts have ruled for Monsanto. However, the U.S. Supreme Court last year agreed to hear the case, and oral arguments for Bowman v. Monsanto are occurring today.

Both sides have their supporters, with food advocacy and antitrust groups lining up for Bowman. Meanwhile, Monsanto has lined up a who’s who of the seed industry and farm groups on its side.

“People who are for me think farmers will be able to save their seed,” he says. That’s not necessarily the case, he points out.

“If you sign an agreement that says you can’t save seed, you can’t do it,” he says.

Nor does he see a mass movement by farmers planting commodity seed as he did. Monsanto fears this would destroy the incentive to develop future technology.

“Elevators just can’t go out and grab soybeans to sell as seed,” he says.

One thing, though, is clear in Bowman’s eyes.

“The only thing that makes sense to me is that Monsanto wants to make an example out of me,” he says.

Different Twist

Bowman’s case is a twist on patent infringement cases that Monsanto has prosecuted in the past. Rather than buy patented seed directly from Monsanto and save it for the next year, Bowman bought commodity seed from a local elevator and planted it as double-cropped soybeans after wheat from 1999 to 2007. Since well over 90% of seed planted in the U.S. is herbicide-tolerant, it’s likely the majority of this seed was Roundup Ready, the patented herbicide-tolerant trait.

Bowman continued to buy patented seed for soybeans that he planted as his first crop at the normal spring planting time. He also signed and complied with agreements for this seed, promising he would not save it.

Double-cropping is risky. If rains and favorable temperatures result, planting soybeans in mid-summer can result in good yields. If drought strikes, though, the crop can be a wipeout. That’s the reason Bowman didn’t want to stick a lot of money into seed.

“I want to use good quality on my first crop,” he says. “I don’t want to plant junk seed out of the elevator.”

Glancing Backward

Looking back, Bowman wishes he would have bought patented commercial seed for his double cropped soybean strategy and compared it against the commodity seed he planted.

“I might have been better off planting the higher quality seed,” he says.

Bowman figures bin-run elevator seed limits yields to just 60% of professionally grown seed.

Bowman says his arrangement with double cropping elevator seed continued until Monsanto sent investigators to his farm. This triggered a legal process that ended up with Bowman owing Monsanto $84,000.

CancelPost Comment
MORE FROM GIL GULLICKSON more +

Open Ag Data Alliance Launched By: 03/13/2014 @ 1:31pm Several industry groups this week moved to address farmer concerns regarding privacy of farmer…

Q&A: David Friedberg, Climate By: 03/05/2014 @ 2:09pm David Friedberg would probably turn few farmer heads if he popped into your local coffee shop…

How Splitting Hybrids and Varieties Can Make… By: 02/27/2014 @ 2:39pm Somewhere, there has to be a field complete with uniform jet-black soils that can spout a…

MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Big Picture: CME Trading Weather