Home / News / Policy news / Carbon trading needs to be transparent, lawmakers told

Carbon trading needs to be transparent, lawmakers told

Agriculture.com Staff 09/10/2009 @ 6:41am

If the Senate passes a cap and trade bill, it needs to be regulated so that trading of carbon credits are transparent and not subject to manipulation, members of the Senate Agriculture Committee were told Wednesday.

"If we're serious about a cap and trade system, that means we must get the trading part right," Ag Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (D-IA) said when he opened the hearing. He added sthat he's concerned about the potential for excessive speculation in carbon credits to distort their value.

Under a bill passed by the House, emitters of greenhouse gases will have to buy offsets, which could include carbon sequestered in the soil of farms that practice no-till, or on land planted to trees.

Gary Gensler, chairman of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), told the panel that the CFTC aleady has experience monitoring the trading of offsets for sulfur dioxide, a regulated byproduct of coal burning that causes acid rain. And the CFTC monitors trading of carbon credits under a voluntary program run by the Chicago Climate Exchange.

For a carbon market to work properly, Gensler said, it will need 5 things: uniform standards, record keeping, oversight of trade, clearing of the trades and prevention of fraud.

Republican members of the Ag Committee remain skeptical that benefits from carbon trading will offset increased input costs for farmers.

"We are asking our farmers and ranchers to bear the burden of this," said former Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns, now a Senator from Nebraska. "I think it’s a given that they will pay higher input costs."

Johanns said at one point that hog producers in his state are saying they're 30 days from going out of business after suffering more than a year of the effects of depressed pork prices and, until recently, high feed costs.

Timothy Profeta, head of the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, told the panel that he, too, knows the struggles of the hog industry but that the effects of carbon trading on feed costs would be nothing like the speculative increase in feed costs of last year.

"The market remains the best way to achieve environmental goals at the lowest cost," he said.

The Institute helped write a new analysis of the effects of the House cap and trade bill on agriculture and concluded that nearly all types of agriculture would benefit from the bill, mainly from increasing crop prices and land values as some land is planted to trees.

But the committee's ranking Republican, Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, cited another study by Texas A&M that shows most producers outside of the Corn Belt would gain little from cap and trade legislation.

The study looked at how the House bill would affect 98 representative farms and ranches across the U.S.

CancelPost Comment
MORE FROM AGRICULTURE.COM STAFF more +

Farm and ranch risk management resources By: 07/07/2010 @ 9:10am Government resources USDA Risk Management Agency Download free insurance program and…

Major types of crop insurance policies By: 07/07/2010 @ 9:10am Crop insurance for major field crops comes in two types: yield-based coverage that pays an…

Marketing 101 - Are options the right tool… By: 07/07/2010 @ 9:10am "If you are looking for a low risk way to protect yourself against prices moving either higher or…

MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Improving Soil Health