Home / News / Policy news / Farm groups oppose split bill

Farm groups oppose split bill

DANIEL LOOKER Updated: 07/03/2013 @ 9:47am Business Editor

One of the largest coalitions of agriculture-related industries sent a letter to the leader of the House of Representatives Tuesday opposing a move by some members to split the nutrition title from the rest of the farm bill.

Because spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and other food programs takes up more than three-fourths of the farm bill, some Representatives from rural states have proposed trying to pass two bills, one for nutrition and one for remaining programs.

National Farmers Union and the American Farm Bureau Federation gathered support of 532 groups who said, in essence, that it's a bad idea in a letter sent to Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH).

The groups told Boehner that they "strongly urge you to bring the Farm Bill (H.R. 1947, the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013) back to the Floor as soon as possible."

"Farm bills represent a delicate balance between America’s farm, nutrition, conservation, and other priorities, and accordingly require strong bipartisan support," the organizations said. "It is vital for the House to try once again to bring together a broad coalition of lawmakers from both sides of the aisle to provide certainty for farmers, rural America, the environment, and our economy in general and pass a five-year farm bill upon returning in July. We believe that splitting the nutrition title from the rest of the bill could result in neither farm nor nutrition programs passing, and urge you to move a unified farm bill forward."

Chandler Goule, a lobbyist for National Farmers Union, told Agriculture.com that his group contacted the staffs of House leaders before sending the letter. All were "very helpful" he said, describing those who work for Boehner as well as Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas (R-OK), and the committee's ranking member Collin Peterson (D-MN). Goule said he also reached out to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA). "Leader Cantor's office absolutely did not respond," Goule said.

"The idea of splitting the bill, this is coming from Leader Cantor's office. It is designed to do two things--cut SNAP benefits more and to dismantle the farm program," Goule asserted. "It's easier to do that if you split the bills."

(Agriculture.com messaged Cantor's press aides Tuesday but so far has not gotten a response.)

Goule also said that farm programs might be hurt more with two separate bills because nutrition spending has different permanent legislation that isn't the same as the farm bill, which amends permanent farm legislation passed in 1938 and 1949.

"Nutrition doesn't need to be reauthorized. It's got its own permanent legislation," Goule said.

Farm Bureau's approach to commodity programs in the farm bill often differs from that of Farmers Union. But when Farm Bureau lobbyist Mary Kay Thatcher was asked if her group shares NFU opposition to splitting the vote on nutrition and the rest of the farm bill, she said, "Absolutely. We want to get it done, but I think going with a split vote is really bad for the future of farm programs."

CancelPost Comment

Darrin Steinert Buying the vote? 07/03/2013 @ 3:45am The farm bill should be known as the food bill, but very few urban dwellers know this fact and our leaders sure won't publicize this information. Congress will lean towards whoever offers them the higher voter percentage. Since the so called farm bill is nearly 80% budgeted toward food stamp receipents, they will do what it takes to keep these people in free food. Just their way of justifying an even trade, food for votes.

Report Abuse Reply

Yield Exclusion Can Boost Your APH By: 01/18/2016 @ 10:26am If you farm in a region that’s been hammered by years of drought – or maybe too much rain –…

Farmers Business Network Announces New… By: 12/17/2015 @ 2:42pm Farmers Business Network, Inc., (FBN) a rapidly growing data sharing and analysis service for…

Silver Linings in EPA Ruling for RFS By: 12/04/2015 @ 4:20pm The EPA’s final blending mandates for biofuels announced Monday are already affecting corn…

This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Ageless Iron TV: Tractors at War