Home / News / Policy news / Farm groups stick to policy

Farm groups stick to policy

DANIEL LOOKER 03/03/2012 @ 8:40pm Business Editor

Groups representing corn and soybean farmers closed out the Commodity Classic in Nashville, Saturday with no major changes in their wish list for commodity programs in the next farm bill. Both have their own versions of “shallow loss” payments that would cover some of the shortfall from crop insurance.
 
And, they’re circling the wagons against major cuts to crop insurance.
 
“Crop insurance is our highest priority,” National Corn Growers president Gary Niemeyer, an Auburn, Illinois farmer, told Agriculture.com.
 
“We want to pass a farm bill, and I would make that your first and last paragraph, and maybe the middle, too,” he said.
 
American Soybean Association president Steve Wellman, who farms near Syracuse, Nebraska, heads a group with similar goals.
 
He’s glad to see that Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) has moved two farm bill hearings a week earlier on the calendar.
 
“Hopefully that’s a good indication they’re going to move as fast as they can to move legislation forward in 2012,” he said.
 
Officially, the ASA policy on a commodity program for a farm bill passed this year remains the same as one adopted last fall the group’s board and its farm bill task force.
 
“ASA developed and supports risk management concepts for the 2012 Farm Bill as a means to partially offset revenue losses that exceed a specified threshold, while complementing crop insurance,” says a resolution the group passed without debate Saturday. “Payments under a revenue-based program should be commodity-specific, and based on the difference between historical and current-year revenue at the farm level.”
 
NCGA’s ideal farm bill program is a similar shallow-loss revenue program, but based at the crop reporting district level. The concept was largely incorporated into a bipartisan farm bill proposal introduced in the Senate last fall called the Aggregate Risk and Revenue Management (ARRM) program.
 
According to Niemeyer and NCGA’s CEO, Rick Tolman, the group is willing to give up direct payments and counter-cyclical payments in the current farm bill in exchange for adopting ARRM, and it would save $20 billion in federal spending over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
 
“We own it,” Anthony Bush, head of the Corn Growers’ Public Policy Action team said proudly as he reported on his group’s work to delegates Saturday.
 
“Farm policy is a moving target right now,” he told the group. “Will we get exactly what we want? Probably not.”
 
Commodity Groups will be under pressure to reach consensus soon. The Senate Ag Committee holds a hearing on the next farm bill’s Commodity Title on March 14 and the committee is expected to write a farm bill soon.
 
But they’re unlikely to reach agreement with conservation groups that want crop insurance tied to the conservation compliance rules that now apply to farm program payments.
 
The Corn Growers voted Saturday to back continued conservation compliance for farm program payments, but they and ASA members voted to oppose linking conservation compliance to crop insurance.
 
ASA has a few other ideas for crop insurance, too.

CancelPost Comment
MORE FROM DANIEL LOOKER more +

Iowa Land Values Tumble By: 12/18/2014 @ 2:11pm High quality farmland in Iowa is worth 9% less than a year ago, according to the Iowa Land Value…

Payment Limit Rule in 2015 By: 12/17/2014 @ 4:43pm The USDA rules on who is considered actively engaged in farming and eligible to receive commodity…

Building an ARC By: 12/16/2014 @ 11:16am When the Agricultural Act of 2014 became law last February, the Farm Bill’s new Agricultural Risk…

MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
The Future of Livestock Production
Agriculture.com

FREE MEMBERSHIP!

CLOSE [X]