Home / News / Policy news / How the stars aligned for ethanol

How the stars aligned for ethanol

DANIEL LOOKER 12/10/2010 @ 5:06pm Business Editor

In spite of the coverage you’re seeing of angry liberals in the House and of Senator Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) filibuster in the Senate, the Obama-congressional compromise on extending tax cuts is very likely to pass, and the new law is almost certain to continue the ethanol tax credit for another year at the current rate of 45 cents a gallon.

This strong possibility wouldn’t even exist without several breaks for the industry, says an influential member of the House, a key Senate staffer and ethanol insiders.

First, when President Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel left last October to run for Mayor of Chicago, he was replaced at the White House by Pete Rouse as interim chief. Rouse once headed the staff for former Democratic Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota, and is said to be supportive of the ethanol industry.


See more on the tax credit:


“Pete deserves credit for this. Thank God we’ve got him over there,” Representative Collin Peterson, a conservative Minnesota Democrat told Agriculture.com Friday. “Pete knows this stuff. He knows all the issues and the politics. We couldn’t have anybody better over there [at the White House].’”

The ethanol industry had many strong advocates in the Senate fighting to get the ethanol tax credit included in the bill, Peterson said. They included Democrats Tom Harkin of Iowa and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Kent Conrad of North Dakota. But the key player may have been Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa. This is his last month as the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, and the timing couldn’t have been better for the ethanol industry since Grassley has long been one of its strongest champions.

Grassley was the one who fought hardest for keeping the tax credit at 45 cents. Earlier this year the House Ways and Means Committee considered a 36 cent credit, a 20% cut, and this month the Senate’s Democratic Finance Committee Chairman, Max Baucus of Montana, also introduced a tax bill with the credit at 36 cents.

CancelPost Comment

Dave Biodiesel Ethanol Boosted Direct Injection Engine (EBDI) cre 12/14/2010 @ 11:12am Many are aware of that. However, there are also many who understand that emissions from burning high amounts of ethanol compared to gasoline is drastically cleaner and extremley much less harmful. Many have also figured out and care that using ethanol does not add to our trade deficet. The money spent stays in this country. Regarding the 3+ mpg loss, there has been a solution to that for quite a few years. Ricardo Engineering designed and created an engine, a V-6 3 or 4L that is twin turbo charged and exceeds both horsepower and torque using E85 and above. It will also burn straight gasoline but has a mpg and performance loss that is conversely significant to using E85 in an engine tuned only for gasoline. Engine availability is around the corner from GM. Ford also has a similar engine that likey could do and perform the same way if their engineering and marketing dept made it available.

Report Abuse Reply

ethanol 12/13/2010 @ 4:16pm Why do people not know that you lose about 3+ mpg with ethanol and that means more fossil fuel to produce more ethanol??

Report Abuse Reply
MORE FROM DANIEL LOOKER more +

Senate Committee Takes on Rail Delays By: 09/17/2014 @ 6:06pm The Senate Commerce Committee passed a bipartisan bill Wednesday that gives the Surface…

Find That FSA Letter Soon By: 09/11/2014 @ 1:23pm Remember that letter you got from your local Farm Service Agency office in late July or early…

Planning for Winter’s Farm Program Sign-up By: 09/10/2014 @ 6:13pm With cash prices already well below some triggers for payments under the 2014 Farm Bill, sign-up…

MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Soil Health at Farm Science Review