CancelPost Comment

Crop Insurance: When "Subsidies" mean "Strong" 02/15/2012 @ 8:10am As a writer, I pay attention to the wordsmithing as Washington begins to discuss...anything. Apparently, certain words are chosen, and then repeated to the point that each of us create our own hard-wired definition and it begins to relieve us from the burden of thought. "Sustainablity" is an extreme example. The crop insurance debate has chosen "Strong". Since I am not yet hardwired for Strong = Subsidies, I am still thinking, but it is getting harder. It is to the point that I am going to ask my insurance company if my unsubsidized car and house insurance is "Weak". As a farmer, I realize the important of crop insurance, but I also understand the importance of risk and how that creates opportunities of innovation. Since the age of farmers creeps up, the policies start looking more like a comforter than a safety net. Just like direct payments are incorporated into land values, crop insurance subsidies are incorporated into status quo at a time when ag really needs new blood that is far more willing to address risk in an innovative manner than with a Strong Subsidy program.

Report Abuse Reply
MORE FROM DANIEL LOOKER more +

Final RFS Rule Soon By: 07/24/2014 @ 2:55pm Senator Al Franken (D-MN) told reporters Thursday after meeting with an adviser to President Barack…

Farm Bill Process Starts Soon By: 07/22/2014 @ 7:44pm In a webinar posted this Tuesday, a Farm Service Agency official and an Iowa State University…

Water Rules War Goes On By: 07/10/2014 @ 5:21pm EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy continued her Midwest campaign to defend her agency's proposed…

MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Scott Shellady: Options 101