Home / News / Policy news / Senate wrestles with commodity programs

Senate wrestles with commodity programs

DANIEL LOOKER 03/14/2012 @ 11:00pm Business Editor

At the end of about five hours of testimony on commodity programs for the next farm bill,  Senate Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Debbie Stabenow left the meeting Thursday with one parting comment to reporters’ questions about how soon her committee will write legislation.

“I say as soon as possible,” Stabenow said. “ Within weeks.”

If there’s any consensus among farm organizations this year, Stabenow is responding to it – a push for a farm bill written this year.

Beyond that, the really tough part of finding a way to satisfy different commodities and regions remains. At the Thursday hearing, delayed by a day due to votes on a transportation bill, most  farm groups supported continuing the current crop insurance program and adding on some form of “shallow loss” program to make up for multiple years of crop losses.

American Farm Bureau Federation is still promoting a significant change, government support for “deep losses” below 75%, with private crop insurance making up the difference at higher levels. But Farm Bureau President Bob Stallman said Thursday that his board has voted to work with other groups to improve the shallow loss proposals, even though they still prefer the deep loss program.

Commodity groups still have their own variations of a shallow loss program.

The National Association of Wheat Growers supports a revenue program modeled on the current farm bill’s ACRE and SURE programs, the group’s president, Erik Younggren said.

“We support multiple safety net programs, including a disaster program,” he said. Earlier this week, Younggren told Agriculture.com that even though his group feels wheat farmers were helped by the current disaster program, known as SURE, they would like to speed up the process of getting paid, perhaps basing payments on the first five months of market prices, not the full year that now delays payments to farmers for about 18 months after a disaster hits.

Pam Johnson, president-elect of the National Corn Growers Association, said her group wants to build on the concept of the ACRE program from the last farm bill and that it likes the aggregate risk and revenue management (ARRM) proposal introduced  last fall by Senators John Thune (R-SD), Sherrod Brown (D-OH),  Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Richard Lugar (R-IN).

Johnson suggested that commodity groups are coming together on the farm bill.

“I think the general consensus is we’re looking to expand revenue programs that would be more effective for each of the crops represented at this table,” she said

The other crops represented at her table included soybeans, rice, peanuts and cotton.

Growers of some of those crops are having a tougher time working with a shallow loss revenue program that would supplement crop insurance payments.

As Jimbo Grissom, president of the Western Peanut Growers Association explained to the panel, peanut growers have not had viable revenue insurance from crop insurers because they aren’t traded on futures markets and there is no reference price.

CancelPost Comment
MORE FROM DANIEL LOOKER more +

Renewing Crop Insurance Debate By: 11/24/2014 @ 5:53pm If you thought the public debate about the cost of crop insurance ended when the 2014 farm bill was…

ARC vs. PLC: Avoid Sign-Up Angst By: 11/21/2014 @ 4:43pm This month kicks off training sessions for farm program choices in many states in the Corn Belt and…

What’s Next for the RFS? By: 11/21/2014 @ 3:57pm When the EPA announced today that it’s rolling the final blending mandate for 2014 into next…

MEDIA CENTERmore +
This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Cool Tools Christmas Edition: Part 2