Home / News / Policy news / White House proposes slashing subsidies

White House proposes slashing subsidies

02/13/2012 @ 11:22am

The Obama administration is proposing to cut billions of dollars of farm subsidies and other spending from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's fiscal-year 2013 budget.

The $23 billion USDA budget proposal--a 3% reduction in USDA spending for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1--includes a complete elimination of the controversial direct-payment subsidy program as well as a reduction in crop-insurance subsidies and costly land-conservation programs.

Cutting the subsidies now makes sense because farm revenue is at historical highs, according to the USDA budget proposal that the White House said will reduce the U.S. budget deficit by $32 billion over 10 years. Net farm income in the U.S. reached $110.9 billion last year, a 28% increase over 2010, according to government data.

The USDA sends out billions of dollars to farmers in direct payments regardless of whether they need it and sometimes even if they aren't actually farming the land that is tied to the subsidies.

The Obama administration has previously proposed shaving the program that pays out roughly $5 billion a year to farmers, but opposition in Congress has remained strong.

In June, Congress struck a provision from the FY 2012 spending bill that would have reduced the number of farmers in the U.S. who could collect farm subsidies by preventing any farmer with an adjusted gross income of more than $250,000 from getting direct payments. Farmers are now prevented from receiving those payments only if they have an AGI exceeding $750,000.

About one million farmers on 260 million acres of land spread around 364 of 435 congressional districts currently collect direct payments, according to the USDA and the Environmental Working Group, a organization that wants to eliminate some farm subsidies and use the money to protect natural habitats.

"The direct-payment program provides producers fixed annual income support payments for having historically planted crops that were supported by Government programs, regardless of whether the farmer is currently producing those crops-or producing any crop, for that matter," the administration said in its budget proposal released Monday.

And many of the farmers who get the payments are already profitable, the White House said. More than half of the farmers who get them have an annual income of more than $100,000.

But the White House also aimed reductions at the insurance companies that cover farmers.

It costs the government about $10 billion a year to run a crop-insurance subsidy program that pays out about $7 billion to farmers in premium subsidies. The remaining $3 billion goes to private insurance companies and that is too much, the Obama administration said.

CancelPost Comment

The Time has come 02/14/2012 @ 7:13am we all knew that this was in the works for a long time. If they want to get rid of direct fine, but I don't like the idea of ending conservation payments. And if we get no direct then how about no more USDA reporting, how much does that cost the tax payers?

Report Abuse Reply

How about we remove some of the non-farm related p 02/13/2012 @ 12:31pm How about eliminating the FDA and setting up a reduced version under the Department of Commerce, then taking things like the school lunch program and put it under the the Department of Health & Human Services along with the Pharmaceutical side of the FDA and USDA, leaving the USDA to serve Farmers and to implement all of it's programs through the Rural Development Funding Program, setting up branches in small town banks to increase accessibility, as well as to have more control over how Banks are using the Real Estate parts of the program. (Many do little or nothing with it, costing Rural Americans millions or more every year by directing them to substandard financing, which enables them to charge higher fees and gain monies from "discount pricing".)

Report Abuse Reply

More Pig Losses Seen, Smithfield Says By: 05/14/2014 @ 7:55am The swine industry is struggling to contain a deadly virus that's sweeping U.S. hog farms…

Senators Turn Up Heat on Railroad Companies By: 05/13/2014 @ 11:39am Four Midwestern U.S. senators add their voices to a growing chorus of farmers, ethanol producers…

Summary of Friday's WASDE Report By: 05/09/2014 @ 2:53pm The following table is provided as a service to Wall Street Journal subscribers in conjunction…

This container should display a .swf file. If not, you may need to upgrade your Flash player.
Ageless Iron TV: Tractors at War