You are here

The New Taboo: Ethanol

In mid-November the Environmental Protection Agency proposed the first cut in the amount of ethanol that must be blended into the nation’s gasoline supply. The move represents one of the biggest setbacks to date for ethanol. Under a 2007 law,

refiners were supposed to blend more than 14 billion gallons of ethanol into the nation's gasoline supply in 2014. Refiners and oil

companies called the level too high, citing that the higher blend could damage engines, and the EPA said it had authority to roll

back the congressional mandate.

The EPA also said it was reacting to market conditions that include an unexpected slowdown in consumers’ demand for gasoline,

which means the ethanol supply could soon outpace the amount motorists could actually use. The oil industry is trying to argue that

the result could be a spike in gasoline prices (unless the government scales back the ethanol requirement) resulting in what the

mandate opponents call the “blend wall.”

The specifics of the proposal are a proposed blend of corn ethanol between 12.7 and 13.2 billion gallons. The current mandate is

14.4 billion. However, the current blend is expected to be somewhere between 12.8 and 13.1 billion for the year ahead and, due to

gasoline consumption not as strong as forecasted, a blend wall is already in place. Ethanol numbers are currently favoring grinding

of corn and, consequently, there are some who believe the 2014 number could actually grow to 13.6 to 13.7 billion gallons. Yet,

from a big picture perspective, what the proposed mandate suggests is a limited or no-growth scenario for ethanol from current

usage levels.

What's the impact for near-term corn prices? On the one hand, usage and the export market for ethanol remains active and strong.

On the other hand, future growth is limited, and this will likely have greater impact on deferred year's prices. Some recent studies

have suggested that corn prices might drop approximately 25 cents on the news, believing that corn production would fall by about

100 million bushels, and ethanol production would drop by about 11% from reduced mandates.

In the end, the ruling suggests corn producers need to sharpen their pencils when looking at pricing opportunities. Gone are the

days of unbridled enthusiasm for endless use of corn as an energy provider. Markets have a tendency to move on perception

and momentum. And for now, if the perception is of limited usage in ethanol, then it's highly likely that the market pricing picture

suggests limited rally potential for corn prices for now.

If you have questions, you can reach Naomi at, or post a marketing

question on the Women in Ag forum.

The data contained herein is believed to be drawn from reliable sources but cannot be guaranteed. Neither the information presented, nor any

opinions expressed constitute a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any commodity. Those individuals acting on this information are responsible

for their own actions. Commodity trading may not be suitable for all recipients of this report. Futures trading involves risk of loss and should be

carefully considered before investing. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Any reproduction, republication or other use of the

information and thoughts expressed herein, without the express written permission of Stewart-Peterson Inc., is strictly prohibited. Copyright 2013

Stewart-Peterson Inc. All rights reserved.

Read more about

Talk in Women in Ag

Most Recent Poll

I will cut expenses by reducing: