You are here

Farmers Edge v. Farmobile Update

The legal battle over which company owns the right to a technology that gathers data from farm machinery took an unexpected turn this week when a federal court in Nebraska ruled in favor of Canadian precision ag tech company Farmers Edge on a counterclaim filed against the company by U.S. ag data start-up Farmobile under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). Ruling on Farmobile’s motion for attorney’s fees, the court found that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that Farmobile and its founders engaged in trade secret misappropriation. The ruling directly calls into question a May 2018 decision from the same court in favor of Farmobile finding that the company did not misappropriate trade secrets.

Evidence from key witnesses presented in the latest trial suggested that Farmobile’s founders filed patent applications and founded Farmobile just a few weeks after they left Crop Ventures, and that the patent applications were similar to work done at Crop Ventures, which was acquired by Farmers Edge in 2014. The court found sufficient support for this evidence and dismissed Farmobile’s claim for the payment of attorneys’ fees in the original lawsuit.

The two companies have been embroiled in an ongoing legal battle since April 29, 2016, when Farmers Edge filed a lawsuit against Farmobile alleging that the start-up misappropriated trade secrets under Nebraska law and violated certain contract terms. In May 2018, the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Farmobile finding that Farmers Edge provided no evidence showing that the start-up used or disclosed the alleged trade secrets. In that ruling, the court stated that “none of the trade secrets identified by FEI (Farmers Edge) are actual trade secrets under Nebraska law because the allegedly protected information was at least readily ascertainable by proper means.”

After the summary judgment ruling, the parties settled their remaining claims except for Farmobile’s claims seeking payment of attorneys’ fees under certain provisions of the DTSA. The May 2018 summary judgment ruling from the court still stands, but the decision states that “this Court’s finding that the allegedly misappropriated information was not secret and was known in the industry will undoubtedly be challenged and could well be reversed.”

In a statement following the summary judgment ruling, Farmers Edge indicated that it plans to appeal. Although the recent ruling may provide the company with additional fodder to support an appellate review of the summary judgment ruling, an August 7, 2018 order from the District Court indicates that the parties have reached a settlement.

Technology Comparison

The technologies giving rise to this dispute are Farmers Edge’s CanPlug device (pictured left) and Farmobile’s PUC device (pictured right).

CAN plug

Famobile PUC

Both pieces of equipment serve similar functions, plugging into farm machinery and aggregating data regarding machine use and function. Crop Ventures started developing the CanPlug in 2012, under the leadership of Ron Osborne, now chief strategy officer at Farmers Edge. In July 2013, when the company was experiencing financial difficulty, three Crop Ventures employees who were working on the commercialization of the technology – Jason Tatge, Heath Gerlock, and Randall Nuss – left. They founded Farmobile later that year, while Osborne continued to develop the CanPlug at Farmers Edge after the Canadian start-up acquired Crop Ventures in 2014.

“The factual backdrop that led to this lawsuit — the individual defendants left Crop Ventures, formed Farmobile, and then started marketing a product similar to one they had worked on at Crop Ventures — supports the assertion of misappropriation of trade secrets claims,” notes Judge Joseph Bataillon in the counterclaim decision.

“The recent ruling is entirely consistent with the appeal. One of the main points of the appeal will be that the court should have let Farmers Edge claims go to trial,” writes Marina Barnes, director of marketing for the company. “The appeal will be filed after the Court enters a final judgment, which is expected soon.”

Farmers Edge is arguably one of the more established companies in the farm management software, sensing, and IoT field with paid subscriptions to its service reaching a reported 22 million acres worldwide. The service combines the machine data collected by the CanPlug with weather data and satellite imagery.

Farmobile Response

Since it was filed, Farmobile has rejected the allegations and described the lawsuit as an attempt to “thwart [its] business model” and to tamp down investors’ potential interest in the company.

“The most recent ruling does not alter the Court’s prior decision granting Summary Judgment in Farmobile’s favor. The Court’s most recent ruling only relates to Farmobile’s counterclaim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act alleging that Farmers Edge acted in bad faith such that Farmobile should be awarded its attorneys’ fees related to the case,” the company stated in a recent press release. Farmobile declined to provide additional comment because of the possibility of an appeal.

The companies are also involved in legal proceedings in the Canadian court system.

Editor's Note: The author of this article is Lauren Manning. This story originally appeared in AgFunderNews.

Want more agriculture, technology, and investment news? Visit for daily news and interviews with ag tech start-ups, investors, and more.

AgFunder logo

Read more about